|
|
EuroDIG 2009
14 - 15 September 2009
|
Tuesday, 15 September 2009, 13.30 – 15.00
|
|
Plenary 3: The post-JPA phase: towards a future Internet governance model
|
|
Focus of the plenary
NTIA-RFC. European recommendation to US DoC about future of ICANN and IANA. What is meant by multistakeholder governance of the internet? What are the respective roles of the different stakeholders? Is the business sector able to take fully responsibility of the well-functioning of the Internet? What would be an appropriate form of regulation for the management of the critical internet resources? On what fundamental values and principles should this be based? Is there a “European common view” on this?
|
|
Organising team
Facilitator: Yrjö Lansipuro, Finish Foreign Ministry, FI
Wolfgang Kleinwächter, University of Aarhus, IAMCR, DE / DK
Martin Boyle, Nominet, UK
Mark Carvell, BERR, UK
Ayesha Hasan, ICC, FR
Laura Hutchison, Nominet, UK
Michiel Leenars, ISOC Netherlands, ISCC ECC, NL
Massimiliano Minisci, ICANN Europe, IT
Rolf Weber, Univertsity of Zurich, CH
|
|
Co-Moderators
|
|
Key participants, panel speakers
Jan Malinowski, Council of Europe, FR
Theresa Swinehart, ICANN, USA
|
|
Format of the session
Interactive with interventions from the floor after each of the following three topics have been discussed by the panel:
1. In attempting to discuss "the post-JPA phase" two weeks before the expiration of the JPA . we´ll face a certain difficulty because presumably even those who know the the shape of things to come may not be at liberty to explain it in detail.
2. Matters that are on the IG agenda regardless, whatever happens to the JPA: accountability - both ex ante and ex post -, the role of all stakeholders including governments, and the impact of the growth and globalization of the internet.
3. The issues directly related to the technical coordination of the Internet's unique identifiers to the vast space of Internet Governance in the broad sense of the word, also adopted by the WSIS. This space has expanded so fast that there is a governance vacuum, which various actors are busy trying to fill. Here we come to the role of the IGF and the promise it holds as a possible framework for all these actors.
|
|
Planned outcome of the session
Enough information to have an approximate idea of the framework where the next steps of IG developments will take place. Identify the role of the IGF and the promise it holds as a possible framework for all actors around Internet Governance.
|
Please enter the EuroDIG password to submit your proposal |
|
|